Showing posts with label Dario Argento. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dario Argento. Show all posts

2 Sept 2012

Tenebrae - Wills review.

I'm sure a film student could go to town on this one; telling us how it lacks Argento's usual strangely colourful lighting, but how despite this the camera work and set design all still have his fingerprints all over them.

They could explore the idea that the films central character was a proxy for Argento himself; The character is a creator of horror and thrillers (books not movies) and is accused of misogynism by a critic (I don't know that the Argento himself ever was, but most purveyors of horror face the charge at some point).[1]

They would probably rave about the clever use of a dream sequence; weaved unexplained throughout the film - it's relevance only becoming clear in the final moments.

Unfortunately, I am not a film student, and so I was board to tears.

Tenebre is, at its core, a very straight forward whodunnit thriller, with only the twists (plural) at the end belaying its giallo roots; if your usual complain with Italian thrillers is that you have no-idea what the hell is going on, then you will find at least one nice thing to say about Tenebrae.

The twists were silly (although I did like the half-twist that came after the main three - one which explained something we had herd about the killers knife) and really didn't fit, but it was solidly acted (mostly) and well-shot (as you would expect) other than that the film was so straight forward (and dull) I really dont have much to say.


Body Count: 11
Boob Count: 2 pairs
Animal Body Count: 1


[1] If I'm right about the proxy thing, then killing the (female) critic who make the observation - half naked no less - may not have been the smartest move.

Please use the comments bellow only to comment on this post - to write your own review, please comment on the main post for this movie.

1 Sept 2012

Tenebrae - Lisa's Review


*** SPOILERS ***

So another Dario Argento outing this week.  I know the guys is the recipient of much praise and is held in awe amongst many movie fans, but I find his movies full of pretentious drivel.  

It has been said that this movie could be seen as something of an autobiographical outing for Argento given the lead character Peter Neal is a murder mystery author who is seen to be something of a misogynist.   That sort of summed it up for me.  I felt the movie centered around the character of Neal to the detriment of everything else.  Many of the female characters seemed unnecessary and just cannon fodder.  The females who had any kind of role were just plain bloody irritating.   One reporter in particular who challenges  Neal with regards to his misogyny just needs a gag and a kick up the behind and sending on her way.

This movie may be more enjoyable on a second viewing as you are left spending most of your time watching the movie guessing whats going on, who could possibly have 'done it' and have countless possibilities presented to you.  To me, it seemed way too many sub stories were going on, including dream sequences, which you weren't really sure were actually dreams and had no idea who was having them.  This becomes clear as the movie reaches a conclusion, but it doesn't stop the irritation of it having no relevance throughout the movie.

I suppose the fact that I didn't care much about what was going on and who in fact was the murderer didn't help.  I just don't like Argento's style at all.  It all felt very self indulgent to me.  The murders were, for the most part, pretty tame and unbloody.  They do get a bit more what you would expect as the body count rises.  One death which is quite effective is the daughter of Neals landlord.  The lead up is very long and drawn out and she has gone through quite a horrendous experience, which included a chase from a rather irate doberman (the choice of vicious dog for the era).  It all culminates in a rather nasty death by axe.   I suppose I did feel a bit sorry for her after all that, but its about the only sympathetic emotion you got out of me during the movie.

Another big irritation with the movie is the bad dubbing and the absolutely awful script, which is made worse by the monotone delivery.  There seems to be no acting whatsoever in the execution.  It just seems to be read very slowly and stilted by someone who doesn't quite understand what they are reading. That, as irritating as it is, doesn't even compare to the accent and acting skills of the lead detective in the movie!!  I think I could do better myself!

One positive I will give the movie is how light and bright it is.  There is no hiding in the dark, no shadowy 'can't quite see whats happening' scenes.  Even the murders take place in bright white light.  Night time scenes are even well illuminated.

The cinematography is excellent in places.  Very well thought out and executed, especially a scene from the viewpoint of the murderer of the house of a lesbian couple who are about to breathe their last.  The panning around of the outside of the building and the roof is very effective and places you right there with the murderer.  I'm sure this was quite difficult to achieve but it is well worth it for the effect.

Unfortunately for me however some nice cinematography of buildings and razors being rinsed don't quite cut it with enjoying a movie.  I wouldn't say this was an awful movie and I would say that a lot of people would enjoy it.  I just don't like this guys style and find that very hard to get past when watching his movies.

Don't feel I wasted my time this week and glad I watched it, but it hasn't elevated my opinion of Dario Argento.


Please use the comments bellow only to comment on this post - to write your own review, please comment on the main post for this movie.

26 Aug 2012

Week 67: Tenebrae




Alternate Titles : Tenebre, Unsane, Shadow, Sotto Gli Occhi dell'Assassino
Year: 1982
Reviews / Author Comments due: 01/09/2012
DPP Status: Successfully prosecuted 
BBFC Status: Passed uncut in 2011 
IMDB: LINK
Wikipedia: LINK
DVD: LINK






Feel free to use the comments section of this post to add your own reviews and thoughts about this movie.

21 Apr 2012

Inferno - Will's Review.

This one's an Argento. And then some. From the primary colored lighting, to the score that manages to feature Prog Rock, Experimental Jazz and opera, to the bug that lets us know shit's about to go down, this week's movie has his fingerprints all over it.

That said, it does lack the batshit insanity of his Giallo work... Probably because of the mainstream funding (this one was paid for by Fox); this isn't to say it's entirely coherent ether...

***Spoilers follow***

Part of the problem with the coherency, may be the fact that it doesn't have a clear lead character; Every time you meet someone why might be lead in any other movie, they die. There is a guy who is in most of the movies final 2/3rds, but I'm, not sure he does enough to qualify as a 'lead' in any traditional sense.

It also doesn't have much in the way of a story - there's a book in it, which tells the story of the "Three Mothers", and this book seems to be of  interest to a lot of people, especially alchemists. One such alchemist, lives under a library that has a copy, but rather than just nipping upstairs and checking it out or removing it from the shelves, he seems content until someone wielding a copy takes a wrong turn and winds up in his basement, then attempts to boil their head.

There are also some pretty ropy effects, like a god awful "Death" costume which is clearly a black jumpsuit with a rubber skeleton on it, and a potentially hilarious scene in which a woman has (what I hope are stuffed) cats thrown at her is attacked by cats...


Sad to say it, because I do like a lot of Argento's work, but this one is a bit of an, albeit beautifully shot, mess.

Body Count: 9
Boob Count: 1 pair (through a wet shirt)
Animal Body Count: 5 kills (including one insect), 2 stuffed lizards on desks.
Most Memorable Death: Knife through neck - with a lovely flow of blood from the mouth.

Please use the comments bellow only to comment on this post - to write your own review, please comment on the main post for this movie.

Inferno - Lisa's Review



*** SPOILERS ***

So a movie from the famous Dario Argento.  I've heard a lot about him, so I was interested to see what all the fuss was about.

Having watched the movie and several parts of it several times, in a vain attempt to work out what was going on, I have to say I'm still wondering about all the fuss.  I will attempt to give a synopsis, but I don't promise that it'll make any sense.

The movie centers around a book called 'The Three Mothers' which (as far as I could make out) was written by an architect who built 3 buildings in different parts of the world.  They housed each of the three mothers (evil women).  There were also 3 keys and strange clues given about where these could be located.  In fact there seemed to be a bit of an obssession generally with the number 3 in this movie.  We also seemed to follow 3 different characters rather than have 1 main lead.

A woman in New York (Rose) is researching the history of her building when she comes across 'The Three Mothers' story.  She thinks she is living in one of the cursed buildings, so she writes a letter to her brother Mark such is her concern (whatever happened to telephones...) asking him to come and see her.  He doesn't read the letter as he is distracted by some uber-hairy eyebrowed woman makes wierd mouth shapes while he is trying to read it (I think it was meant to be alluring).  The girl sitting beside him (Sarah) however sees fit to read the letter when he leaves it behind  (nosey cow!).

So having read the letter, this new character goes to a library to check out 'The Three Mothers' book.  She is completely freaked out by what she reads and from there everything just goes completely crazy.  Sarah is stabbed, along with some wierd guy that turns up, who ironically makes a big deal in not believing in the supernatural.  He gets a nice big pointy knife to the throat.

Mark finds the 2 bodies and returns to New York to look for his sister.  We meanwhile know Rose has also been killed.  He finds out via people in her building that she has disappeared so he starts to look for her with some help from one of her friends, Elise.

He meets several weird people, including a mute guy in a wheelchair (who you just know will show up again) and starts to investigate his sisters disappearance.  What happens from then on is complete confusion to me.

 People die -  Elise is stabbed while trying to help Mark - The original seller of the book to Rose is eaten by rats after trying to drown some cats in a lake.  He is then stabbed by a hotdog seller who hears his cries - A caretaker starts a fire accidentally and is burnt to death.

Mark at the ending discovers the mute guy in the wheelchair is in fact the author of the book and the architect of the 3 buildings.  Blah Blah Blah he manages to do away with him.  One of the three mothers makes an appearance (it was one of the women he met earlier) and the fire gets her as it causes the building to collapse.  Mark escapes.

Wondering WTF?  Yup I was too.

I know a lot of people are big Argento fans, but after this I doubt I will be joining those masses.  He seems to be more intent in creating something that looks the way he wants it to, rather than something that makes any kind of sense or is entertaining to the viewer.  He uses red and blue light a lot and although visually some of the scenes in the movie look fantastic, surely that shouldn't be at the expense of the movie?

I've also heard people talk about the soundtrack.... I hated it.  It was loud and distracting (as if you needed any more distracting).

My rating?  Avoid unless you're a pretentious art student or someone who likes to say they enjoy Argento just to look cultured.  Looks good, unfortunately doesn't deliver on any other level.

Please use the comments bellow only to comment on this post - to write your own review, please comment on the main post for this movie.